Mind Game: Why US states are competing to ban brain chips Subdermal microchips visible under the skin at the base of a girl’s neck demonstrate an emerging implantable technology. Credit: Oleksii Halutva, Shutterstock.
They haven’t arrived at your local job search center yet, but American lawmakers are already banging on the door of forced human microchip implants – before a single company is asking you to walk it.
13US states currently have preemptive bans on essential microchip implants for workers, making them more likely to follow. These tips, often inserted under the skin, are the main targets of current laws and are primarily in the field of experimental medical care, rather than brain implants. No one forces what is missing. But lawmakers are now warnings before big technology and government get bright ideas.
“Technology is moving forward, and we’ll be fools to not try to deal with danger,” said Mississippi Sen. Kevin Blackwell.
Carnegie Council on Ethics for International Affairs I recently dropped Report Neural ZAP-like title: “The rise of preemptive ban on human microchip implants.” It shows policymakers are screaming against a future where tracking staff might become as easy as scanning their hands.
Here’s the problem. Over 50,000 people worldwide have already voluntarily received subdermal microchips. The small sized technique of rice slid under the skin to act as a contactless credit card, gym pass, or even a digital business card. Naturally, Sweden is leading the charges.
However, the trend in this technology is not the Scandinavian novelty of hipsters. It is a battlefield of ethics, privacy and power. And it’s far from many harmless claims.
Important distinctions: These subdermal implants sit just below the skin and are not bounded by the brain. They are not the same as brain chips embedded in the skull and interact directly with neural activity. Risk and bets are much higher in brain computer interfaces.
DIY cyborg and underground chip scene
on the other hand, Wild West California’s biohacking “Grindfest” has become a cyborg comic con. Magician Anastasia Sinn holds the Guinness World Record for most implants: counting 52. She uses them to unlock doors, play videos, and carry the ashes of her late husband.
“What everyone wants is NeuralInk,” Synn told ABC News. “But Elon doesn’t open source it like we do.”
Others have tested magnetic implants that can sense LED nails, prosthetic laser eyes, and live wires. One attendee was called “Biohacker Disneyland.”
But even here, danger looms. DIY implant risk infection, inflammation, flat MRI incompatibility. Some tips have commemorative videos. Others open the car door. Everything raises the question: Should you just be because you can become a machine?
Plan to upgrade Elon Musk: The Chip Kingpin brain
Of course, the mention of implants leads to everything Elon MuskI’m not just dreaming of self-driving cars Pregnancy Robot But self-improvement person.
His company Neuralink has already implanted brain chips in test patients, promising a future where people can communicate, work, or interact with them using only their own ideas. This is a game changer for people with paralysis or severe disabilities. This reality is not as far as we think.
Enter Noland Arbaugh, the first human subject in Neuralink. Paralyzed from his shoulder after a diving accident, Arbaugh made headlines to play video games using nothing but his thoughts.
“That should not be possible, but it is,” he told the BBC with a smile from his hospital bed. His Neuralink chip allows him to move the cursor with his pure brain.
Sci-fi or spyware? Dark sides of mind control
So what’s the catch? Well, there are multiple.
Security Experts Brain Computer Interface (BCIS) warns you that the most intimate data can be hacked, hijacked or mined for your own thoughts. Researchers have already shown that malware can be sent via NFC. One patient even admitted that his Neuralink could theoretically be hacked.
And if you think that’s unsettling, consider this: what happens when brain data is sold to advertisers? Or have you been summoned in court? Or was it misused by an unfair regime?
Anil Seth, a professor of neuroscience at the University of Sussex, said that frankly. Really There are no other barriers to personal privacy left. ” (BBC))
China is on the way Race
China is charging before that so that it doesn’t lose My own Brain chip program. Neucyber and the Chinese Brain Institute have implanted the “Beinao No. 1” chip into three patients, with plans for another 10 this year.
Their goal? Overtakes Musk with a huge amount of data volume. State media proudly broadcast patients using thought-guided robotic arms.
This is a technology war with Brainpower, a competition to control not only cell phone data but also skull impulses.
Europe joins the heart game
The US and China fight it for the hegemony of neurotechnology, but Europe is not idle.
In the UK, NHS researchers have launched a £6.5 million clinical trial using ultrasound-based brain implants to treat depression, OCD and addiction. Called “non-invasive BCI,” it is the first sci-fi of this kind, partly salvation.
Throughout the channel, Spanish blood-sucking neuroelectronics are testing graphene brain chips that decode signals with incredible accuracy. Meanwhile, the Portuguese Brain-on-a-chip project will help scientists test treatments for Alzheimer’s disease with microchips that mimic the human mind.
And in the world, the 13-year-old British boy received brain implants to treat epilepsy, reducing his seizures by 80%. Tip? A pocket-sized nerve stimulator that restores the thalamus to balance.
From the graphene surgery at the University of Manchester Implants, Europe has made bold advances in retinal technology that restores vision, but without the hype of Silicon Valley.
EU and British orthodontics for legal showdowns
While the technology world prepares to plug us in, European lawmakers are laying legal firewalls In the same way.
In Brussels, the EU is pushing for new laws to protect the nervous system, including mental privacy, cognitive freedom, and psychological integrity. Council of Europe As long as we recommend binding legal frameworks, Stop Future abuse of neuroengineering.
Meanwhile, the UK is taking its own measures. Currently, there are no laws requiring microchip implants, but the Data Protection Act of 2018 and the existing Employment Act already provide several protection measures. The Trade Union Conference (TUC) raised a red flag about the idea of workplace surveillance via microchips, revealing that the government has no plans to instill citizens.
What about privacy? The GDPR and its UK counterparts already exist Stretch the muscles In a recessed cover Technology. Employers who were thinking of cutting staff had better braces for legal blows.
So, while no one is forced to lack in Europe or the UK yet, legal barricades are being constructed rapidly before technology knocks.
But the real battlefield may not be in offices or public spaces. It could be behind the hospital door. Someone who is in a coma state or with severe cognitive decline is implanted when someone is “for them” My own good”? If they cannot give explicit consent, who will decide? And how long does “treatment” go blurry to the experiment? It is a legal and ethical minefield waiting for an explosion.
Final Thoughts: Freedom, Future, or Frankenstein?
Microchip implants promise miracles – regaining movement, treating illness, flat Gives impaired digital autonomy. But the same tip you can walk again could one day be used to track your every move, or thought.
As the nation competes for planting and regulation, the world watches with caution and adoration. One thing is clear. The future lies here. It is a war over the human mind. And it’s secretly already started.
The technology can be exciting. But does that mean? It’s enough to pause anyone.
So, before you scan your hands and enter the office, ask yourself: Who else is watching?
Get more Technology News.
